ArticleScientific reports2024
Paired-eye comparison of endothelial cell density and vault height after implantable collamer lens implantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three Year Results from the United States FDA Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Trial
- Development and Clinical Evaluation of an Anterior Chamber Angle-Based Lens Sizing Method for Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Influence of Preoperative Contact Lens Wearing Patterns on Corneal Endothelial Cell Density After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Pseudoexfoliative Deposits on an Implantable Collamer Lens: A Case Report.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, the effect of a high vault on corneal endothelial cells after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation remains unclear. Many clinicians theoretically assume that a high postoperative vault leads to rapid endothelial damage, but no study has yet proven this hypothesis. We conducted a paired-eye study to compare changes in corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) between high and low postoperative vault groups. This retrospective study included 150 eyes of 75 patients with bilateral postoperative vault levels differing by more than 200 μm after ICL implantation. Patients were followed up for 7 years with ECD measurements, and changes in ECD were assessed between 6 months and 7 years post-surgery. Over the 7-year follow-up period, the percentage of ECD loss was 15.04% and 14.45% in the high- and low-vault groups, respectively. The bilateral paired-eye comparison revealed a significant reduction in ECD in the high-vault group at 3, 5, and 7 years postoperatively (P-value < 0.001). In this paired-eye comparison of long-term observations, a higher vault was associated with greater ECD loss. Our study confirms that a high vault level may be an important risk factor for ECD loss following ICL implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.