ArticleScientific reports2024
Quantum machine learning enhanced laser speckle analysis for precise speed prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Meets Nail Diagnostics: Emerging Image-Based Sensing Platforms for Non-Invasive Disease Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is an optical technique used to assess blood flow perfusion by modeling changes in speckle intensity, but it is generally limited to qualitative analysis due to difficulties in absolute quantification. Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs) enhance the quantitative performance of LSCI by excelling at extracting spatiotemporal features from speckle data. However, excessive downsampling techniques can lead to significant information loss. To address this, we propose a hybrid quantum-classical 3D CNN framework that leverages variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) to enhance the performance of classical models. The proposed framework employs variational quantum circuits (VQCs) to replace the 3D global pooling layer, enabling the model to utilize the complete 3D information extracted by the convolutional layers for feature integration, thereby enhancing velocity prediction performance. We perform cross-validation on experimental LSCI speckle data and demonstrate the superiority of the hybrid models over their classical counterparts in terms of prediction accuracy and learning stability. Furthermore, we evaluate the models on an unseen test set and observe that the hybrid models outperform the classical models with up to 14.8% improvement in mean squared error (MSE) and up to 26.1% improvement in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) evaluation metrics. Finally, our qualitative analysis shows that the hybrid models offer substantial improvements over classical models in predicting blood flow at both low and high velocities. These results indicate that the hybrid models possess more powerful learning and generalization capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.