ArticleScientific reports2024
An adaptive decision support system for outpatient appointment scheduling with heterogeneous service times.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Access improvement in healthcare: a 12-step framework for operational practice.Frontiers in health services · 2024Pooled it
- Data-driven network diagnostics for optimizing POCUS management: an actionable hospital analytical approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in oral health management: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Reinforcement learning for healthcare operations management: methodological framework, recent developments, and future research directions.Health care management science · 2025Review
- Predicting hospital outpatient volume using XGBoost: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Appointment scheduling (AS) plays a crucial role in outpatient clinic management. Traditional methods involve patient grouping using pre-defined rules and scheduling based on these groups. However, pre-defined rules may not adequately capture the heterogeneity in patients' service times (i.e., consultation duration). Advanced machine learning (ML) methods can address individual-level heterogeneity but pose challenges for practical scheduling. To strike a balance, we propose a data-driven AS decision support system, Cluster-Predict-Schedule (CPS), integrating both supervised and unsupervised ML for efficient patient grouping and scheduling. The novelty of CPS lies in its adaptability to service time heterogeneity through a data-driven approach, determining patient groups based on data rather than pre-defined rules. Additionally, CPS includes a generic and efficient algorithm for generating appointment templates adaptable to any number of patient groups. Our system's efficacy is demonstrated using a real-world dataset. Evaluated by the weighted sum of patient wait times, physician idle time, and overtime, CPS achieves up to 15.0% cost reduction compared to the FCFA (first-call, first-appointment) scheme and over 4.7% savings against the common New/Return classification with traditional sequencing candidate (TSC) rules. In addition, CPS enhances outpatient operational efficiency without compromising fairness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.