ArticleScientific reports2024
Aging and the visual perception of rigid and nonrigid motion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonrigid forms of motion are commonplace in everyday life. Given previously documented age-related deteriorations in various tasks involving motion (discriminating speed, identifying motion direction, etc.), an experiment was conducted to evaluate the potential effect of age upon the visual ability to detect rigid and nonrigid object motion. Thirty younger and older observers participated in the experiment (mean ages were 19.9 and 75.8 years, respectively). As has been done multiple times in the past, the individual motions of object vertices were manipulated to simulate either rigid motion (rotation in depth, with or without precession) or two different types of nonrigid motion (also rotation in depth with or without precession, but with added object deformation). In confirmation of previous research, there were large effects of nonrigid motion type and precession upon the ability to differentiate between rigid and nonrigid object motion. There was also a large effect of age, such that the discrimination performance of the younger observers was 49.6% higher than that exhibited by the older observers. In this first ever study of aging and nonrigid object motion perception, we thus find that aging is associated with a substantial impairment in the ability to visually perceive object nonrigidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.