Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of different imaging devices and navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement: an experimental study on screw accuracy, screw placement time and radiation dose.

Eric Mandelka, Justine Wolf, Antonia Medrow, Paul A Gruetzner, Sven Y Vetter, Jula Gierse

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric MandelkaResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Justine WolfResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Antonia MedrowResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Paul A GruetznerResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Sven Y VetterResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-9276
Jula GierseResearch group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. jula.gierse@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) provide biomechanically superior fixation compared to other techniques but are technically more demanding. Navigated CPS placement has been increasingly reported as a safe and accurate technique, yet there are few studies comparing different combinations of imaging and navigation systems under comparable conditions. With this study, we aimed to compare different imaging and navigation systems for CPS placement in terms of accuracy, screw placement time and applied radiation dose. For this experimental study, navigated CPS placement was performed at levels C2 to C7 in 24 identical radiopaque artificial spine models by two surgeons with different levels of experience using three different combinations of intraoperative 3D imaging devices and navigation systems. Accuracy, time and radiation dose were compared between the groups. In total, 288 screws were placed. Accuracy was > 98% in all groups with no significant differences between groups or between surgeons (P = 0.30 and P = 0.31, respectively), but the inexperienced surgeon required significantly more time (P < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly higher with iCT compared to CBCT (P < 0.0001). Under experimental conditions, accuracy rates of > 98% were achieved for navigated CPS placement regardless of the imaging modality or navigation system used. Radiation doses were significantly lower for CBCT compared to iCT guidance.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraePedicle ScrewsRadiation DosageSurgery, Computer-AssistedCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalSpinal FusionSurgical Navigation SystemsCervical pedicle screwsCervical spineIntraoperative 3D imagingPosterior screw fixationRadiation doseSpinal navigation

Identifiers

PMID39532943
PMCPMC11557700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.