ArticleScientific reports2024
SNPs and blood inflammatory marker featured machine learning for predicting the efficacy of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying and predicting gait stability metrics in people with stroke in uneven-surface walking using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative machine learning identifies lactylation-related gene signature prognostic for chemotherapeutic efficacy in colorectal carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- An Integrative Review of Computational Methods Applied to Biomarkers, Psychological Metrics, and Behavioral Signals for Early Cancer Risk Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Differential expression of capecitabine-related metabolic enzymes in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical value: a retrospective cohort study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy responses in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients vary widely, highlighting the role of pharmacogenomics in developing better predictive models. We analyzed 379 CRC patients receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, collecting data on fluorouracil metabolism-related SNPs (TYMS, MTHFR, DPYD, RRM1), blood inflammatory markers, and clinical status. Six machine learning models-K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), LightGBM, and random forest-were compared against multivariate logistic regression and a deep learning model (i.e., multilayer perceptron, MLP). Feature importance analysis highlighted seven predictors: histological grade, N and M staging, monocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, MTHFR rs1801131, and RRM1 rs11030918. In a five-fold cross-validation, XGBoost and GBDT exhibited superior performance, with Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.88 ± 0.02. XGBoost excelled in identifying favorable prognosis (recall = 0.939). GBDT demonstrated balance in recognizing both categories, with a recall for favorable prognosis of 0.908 and a precision for unfavorable prognosis of 0.863. MLP had a similar AUC (0.87) with high precision for favorable prognosis (recall = 0.946). In external validation, XGBoost model achieved an accuracy of 0.79. An online prognostic tool based on XGBoost was developed, integrating metabolism-related SNPs and inflammatory markers, enhancing CRC treatment precision and supporting tailored chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.