Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hyperspectral imaging analysis for early detection of tomato bacterial leaf spot disease.

Xuemei Zhang, Boris A Vinatzer, Song Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuemei ZhangSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Boris A VinatzerSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Song LiSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA. songli@vt.edu.

Funding

USDA 2021-67021-34037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for early disease detection have shown promising results, yet there is a lack of validated high-resolution (spatial and spectral) HSI data representing the responses of plants at different stages of leaf disease progression. To address these gaps, we used bacterial leaf spot (Xanthomonas perforans) of tomato as a model system. Hyperspectral images of tomato leaves, validated against in planta pathogen populations for seven consecutive days, were analyzed to reveal differences between infected and healthy leaves. Machine learning models were trained using leaf-level full spectra data, leaf-level Vegetation index (VI) data, and pixel-level full spectra data at four disease progression stages. The results suggest that HSI can detect disease on tomato leaves at pre-symptomatic stages and differentiate bacterial disease spots from abiotic leaf spots. Using VI data as features for machine learning improved overall classification performance by 26-37% compared to the direct use of raw data. Critical wavelength bands and VIs varied across disease progression stages, suggesting that pre-symptomatic disease detection relied more on changes in leaf water content (1400 nm) and plant defense hormone-mediated responses (750 nm) rather than changes in leaf pigments or internal structure (800-900 nm), which may become more crucial during symptomatic stages. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of bacterial spot disease, revealing the potential benefits of leaf structure segmentation and VI group pattern analysis in HSI studies for the early detection of leaf diseases.

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingMachine LearningPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesSolanum lycopersicumXanthomonas

Identifiers

PMID39532930
PMCPMC11557939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.