ArticleScientific data2024
Spatially integrated cortico-subcortical tracing data for analyses of rodent brain topographical organization.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Software and pipelines for registration and analyses of rodent brain image data in reference atlas space.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- NeuroCarta: An automated and quantitative approach to mapping cellular networks in the mouse brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cerebral cortex extends axonal projections to several subcortical brain regions, including the striatum, thalamus, superior colliculus, and pontine nuclei. Experimental tract-tracing studies have shown that these subcortical projections are topographically organized, reflecting the spatial organization of sensory surfaces and body parts. Several public collections of mouse- and rat- brain tract-tracing data are available, with the Allen mouse brain connectivity atlas being most prominent. There, a large body of image data can be inspected, but it is difficult to combine data from different experiments and compare spatial distribution patterns. To enable co-visualization and comparison of topographical organization in mouse brain cortico-subcortical projections across experiments, we represent axonal labelling data as point data in a common 3D brain atlas space. We here present a collection of point-cloud data representing spatial distribution of corticostriatal, corticothalamic, corticotectal, and corticopontine projections in mice and exemplify how these spatially integrated point data can be used as references for experimental investigations of topographic organization in transgenic mice, and for cross-species comparison with corticopontine projections in rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.