Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532798›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treatment of refractory epilepsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.

Yousef Hawas, Abdallah Abbas, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abo Zeid, Mohammad Al Diab Al Azzawi, Hamza Khaled Alsalhi, Ahmed Negida

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yousef HawasFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Gharbeya, Egypt. yousef.ahmed.hawas7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0361-4609
Abdallah AbbasFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5101-5972
Ibraheem M AlkhawaldehFaculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0187-1583
Mohamed Abo ZeidFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Gharbeya, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8165-9470
Mohammad Al Diab Al AzzawiFaculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6776-6467
Hamza Khaled AlsalhiFaculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-1821
Ahmed NegidaDepartment of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5363-6369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the currently available treatment, one-third of epilepsy patients continue to experience seizures. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential neuromodulation approach for the non-invasive treatment of refractory epilepsy. This study aims to provide a comprehensive investigation of the efficacy and safety of tDCS in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. The following databases were searched from inception until June 2023; PubMed, Scopus, Embase, WOS, EBSCO, Cochrane Central, and Ovid MEDLINE. Pooled mean difference was calculated for change in seizure frequency (SF), and number of Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) at different follow-up intervals. We included nine parallel randomized sham-controlled trials with a total of 267 patients. Active tDCS patients had a significantly lower SF per month at 4 and 8 weeks (MD = -4.06, 95% CI [-6.01 to -2.12], p < 0.0001), and (MD = -2.66, 95% CI [-5.09 to -0.23], p = 0.03), respectively. However, weekly SF showed no statistically significant results at 4 weeks of follow-up. The IEDs were observed to significantly decline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks of follow-up. The reported adverse events were mild including mild itching and erythematous rash that resolved spontaneously. In conclusion, tDCS significantly reduced monthly SF and the number of IEDs. Future large RCTs with standard clear informed parameters are still required.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeInterictal epileptiform dischargesRefractory epilepsySeizure frequencyTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39532798
PMCPMC11772517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.