ArticleNeurocritical care2025
Extracerebral Normalization of
Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal PET/MR imaging of prolonged disorders of consciousness: a pilot feasibility study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Sex-Associated Cerebellar and Hippocampal Volume Reduction in Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from the Clinical ADNI Cohort and STZ Animal Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying patients likely to regain consciousness early on is a challenge. The assessment of consciousness levels and the prediction of wakefulness probabilities are facilitated by
methodsEighty-seven patients with prolonged DoC newly diagnosed with behavioral Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores and
resultsAmong the 87 patients with DoC who received routine treatments, 52 patients showed recovery of consciousness, whereas 35 did not. The classification of the standardized uptake value ratio by extracerebral tissue model demonstrated a higher specificity and lower sensitivity in predicting consciousness recovery than the classification of the standardized uptake value ratio by cerebellum model. With area under the curve values of 0.751 ± 0.093 and 0.412 ± 0.104 on the test sets, respectively, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.73). The combination of standardized uptake value ratio by extracerebral tissue and computed tomography depth features with behavioral CRS-R scores yielded the highest classification accuracy, with area under the curve values of 0.950 ± 0.027 and 0.933 ± 0.015 on the training and test sets, respectively, outperforming any individual mode.
conclusionsIn this preliminary study, a multimodal prognostic model based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
39532777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.