ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Progress in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Fertility Preservation Therapy of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.
Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-term efficacy and reintervention of focused ultrasound ablation surgery monotherapy for adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Seedling fibroid characterization using optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in uterine fibroids following high intensity focused ultrasound ablation vs. laparoscopic myomectomy: a propensity score-matched observational study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Female Sexual Dysfunction After High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound versus Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy for Adenomyosis: Associations with Anxiety and Depression.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for adenomyosis: current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- In vitro fertilization-assisted pregnancy combined with high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis with successful pregnancy: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-mediated nanomaterials for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Review
- Evaluating pregnancy outcomes in women with uterine fibroids treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound: insights from a single-institution study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Article
- Synergistic Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Focused Ultrasound Ablation Surgery Combined with Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation in Treating Adenomyosis: A Prospective Controlled Study.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an effective and safe non-invasive treatment method, widely used in the treatment of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in the field of gynecology. The side effects in HIFU is low in incidence and mild. HIFU can significantly alleviate the symptoms of patients, reduce lesion volumes, improve quality of life, and has good cost-effectiveness. HIFU can accurately ablate the uterine fibroids and adenomyosis lesions, without destroying normal myometrium and endometrium, and thus HIFU is a promising alternative to myomectomy in uterine fibroids patients with fertility desire. Several studies have shown that in terms of ovarian endocrine function protection, HIFU treatment is superior to uterine artery embolization, and similar to myomectomy. Existing limited researches show that patients with uterine fibroids have a favorable pregnancy rate and live birth rate, as well as a lower natural abortion rate after HIFU treatment. Pregnancy rate after HIFU treatment for uterine fibroids is not lower than myomectomy, and higher than uterine artery embolization. HIFU may have significant advantages in shortening pregnancy interval compared with myomectomy. However, the proportion of cesarean section delivery after HIFU treatment is relatively high, and gestational uterine rupture after HIFU treatment exist in literature. Higher quality clinical data is needed to confirm the pregnancy outcomes and safety after HIFU treatment in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.