Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532737›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Pressure reduction and suction characteristics of the new digital single use flexible ureteroscope with suction: an in-vitro experimental study.

Begoña Ballesta Martinez, Laurian Dragos, Vasileios Tatanis, Bhaskar Somani, Pedro Campillo Martinez, Oriol Angerri, Angelis Peteinaris, Arman Tsaturyan, Andres Kanashiro, Marina Garces Valverde and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Begoña Ballesta MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain. bballestamartinez@gmail.com.
Laurian DragosUniversity of Cambridge NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Vasileios TatanisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Pedro Campillo MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Oriol AngerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Angelis PeteinarisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Arman TsaturyanDepartment of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia.
Andres KanashiroDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Marina Garces ValverdeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Manuel Christian Garcia SerranoDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Haemodinamics, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Javier Lopez VivoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopó, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Sergio Fumero ArteagaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ntra Sra de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the time taken by the single use 7.5Fr suction flexible ureteroscope to reduce pressure under 40 mm Hg and to characterize the behavior of stones, fragments and dust during suction activation.

methodsAn in vitro setting was developed for this experiment. A saline-filled globe, with the 7.5Fr single-use suction flexible ureteroscope, PU3033AH (ZhuHai Pusen Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Guangdon, China), an automatic irrigation pump and a pressure monitoring set were used at four modalities; i) continuous suction, no irrigation inflow; ii) continuous suction, irrigation inflow on; iii) one-second rate intermittent suction, irrigation inflow on, and iv) half-second rate intermittent suction, irrigation inflow on. The behavior of calcium oxalate stones from 0.5 to 5 mm when being aspirated via the ureteroscope into a plastic container filled with saline was recorded.

resultsSuction with the PU3033AH worked properly with the inflow irritation on. The fastest strategy to lower the pressure was by continuously pressing the suction button with the irrigation inflow on. Overall, the median time to reach 40 mg was roughly 3.5 s. The PU3033AH could aspirate 0.5 mm stones. The suction mode on a continuous pattern allowed the relocation of stones ranging from 1 to 5 mm on an experimental setup with no obstacles.

conclusionThe PU3033AH was efficient in lowering pressure in a closed cavity mimicking the renal pelvis. Likewise, stone fragments under one millimeter were aspirated by the device whereas stones from one to five mm could be displaced when activating suction in continuous mode on an experimental setup with no obstacles.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignPressureUreteroscopesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesSuctionBasic researchDirect-in-scope-suctionSingle use ureteroscopeSuctionUreteroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.