ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Pressure reduction and suction characteristics of the new digital single use flexible ureteroscope with suction: an in-vitro experimental study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The evolution of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a comprehensive meta-analysis of suction-assisted versus conventional techniques against mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm renal stones.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Global Direct In-scope Suction Study: An EAU-endourology Multicenter Prospective Collaboration (DISS-study).European urology open science · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Negative Pressure Suction-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi and Construction of a Stone-Free Rate Prediction Model.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Real-world DISS practice combined with and without access sheath: insights from the global DISS dataset: a EAU endourology study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with and without direct in-scope suction: a retrospective analysis.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Size matters: not all scopes are created equal! A flow rate reality check for single-use flexible ureteroscopes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Pressure and sheath settings in a flexible suction ureteral access sheath: in-vitro assessment for retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Direct-in-scope suction with a 5.1Fr large working channel ureteroscope: what stone dust size for effective evacuation during laser lithotripsy? An in vitro analysis by PEARLS and section of EAU Endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Measurement and comparison of intrarenal pressures during retrograde intrarenal surgery using novel flexible ureteroscopes with integrated direct in-scope suction: An experimentalCentral European journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the time taken by the single use 7.5Fr suction flexible ureteroscope to reduce pressure under 40 mm Hg and to characterize the behavior of stones, fragments and dust during suction activation.
methodsAn in vitro setting was developed for this experiment. A saline-filled globe, with the 7.5Fr single-use suction flexible ureteroscope, PU3033AH (ZhuHai Pusen Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Guangdon, China), an automatic irrigation pump and a pressure monitoring set were used at four modalities; i) continuous suction, no irrigation inflow; ii) continuous suction, irrigation inflow on; iii) one-second rate intermittent suction, irrigation inflow on, and iv) half-second rate intermittent suction, irrigation inflow on. The behavior of calcium oxalate stones from 0.5 to 5 mm when being aspirated via the ureteroscope into a plastic container filled with saline was recorded.
resultsSuction with the PU3033AH worked properly with the inflow irritation on. The fastest strategy to lower the pressure was by continuously pressing the suction button with the irrigation inflow on. Overall, the median time to reach 40 mg was roughly 3.5 s. The PU3033AH could aspirate 0.5 mm stones. The suction mode on a continuous pattern allowed the relocation of stones ranging from 1 to 5 mm on an experimental setup with no obstacles.
conclusionThe PU3033AH was efficient in lowering pressure in a closed cavity mimicking the renal pelvis. Likewise, stone fragments under one millimeter were aspirated by the device whereas stones from one to five mm could be displaced when activating suction in continuous mode on an experimental setup with no obstacles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39532737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.