ArticlePsychological research2024
Timing matters: investigating the interplay of presentation duration and congruency in approximate number processing.
Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approximate number system (ANS) is an innate number sense ability; it plays a pivotal role in the development of symbolic number ability. Despite studies using a wide range of presentation durations of stimuli to investigate the approximate number processing, limited literature has systematically explored its impact on approximate number processing. Further, if increasing presentation duration leads to improved accuracy, it remains unclear whether this improvement will be driven by better performance in both congruent and incongruent conditions or only in one condition. Addressing these gaps, the present study investigated the impact of presentation duration on the approximate number processing among 45 college-going adult participants from India. The dot number comparison task was used to measure ANS, with stimuli presentation duration manipulated at the following durations: 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 3000 milliseconds (or until response). Based on the congruency of non-numerical features of dots with numerosity of dots, trials were categorized into congruent and incongruent trials. Repeated measure ANOVA revealed a positive relationship between the presentation duration and dot number comparison accuracy. However, a saturation point in performance was observed at a presentation duration of 500 milliseconds, beyond which increased duration did not lead to enhanced accuracy. Further analysis based on congruency revealed that performance improvement was confined only to congruent conditions. Drawing on samples from India, the study offers valuable insights into the ANS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39532732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.