ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Effect of left colonic artery preservation on perfusion at the anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery evaluated with intraoperative ultrasound.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed fluorescence on indocyanine green angiography reflects impaired red blood cell perfusion: implications for intraoperative perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of surgical site infection on short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a two-center retrospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Left colic artery-preserving radical rectal cancer surgery: a literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative ultrasound was used to assess the flow velocity in the marginal vessel arch adjacent to the anastomosis, critical for evaluating the anastomotic blood supply. This technique also enabled us to investigate the potential effects of preserving the left colonic artery on the perfusion of the anastomosis.
methodsThis prospective study included 40 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection between January 2021 and January 2023. The length of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was measured from its origin to the first branch, and the diameters of the mesenteric vessel IMA, left colonic artery (LCA), and marginal mesenteric artery (MMA) were recorded. Blood flow velocity and Doppler ultrasound waveforms of the MMA near the anastomosis were collected. Measurements were taken both before and after clamping the IMA using atraumatic forceps. The tardus parvus pattern of the MMA ultrasound waveforms was recorded to evaluate the hypoperfusion status of the anastomosis.
resultsThe mean velocities of MMA were 47.9 cm/s before clamping and 34.9 cm/s after atraumatic clamping, indicating significant differences (p < 0.05). Thirteen patients (32.5%) exhibited a Tardus parvus pattern after IMA atraumatic clamping. Multivariate analysis revealed older age and LCA diameter as independent clinical predictors of the hypoperfusion status after IMA clamping.
conclusionsPreservation of the LCA may improve perfusion near the anastomosis during rectal cancer surgery. Older age and LCA diameter can be considered useful predictors of the mesenteric hypoperfusion status after IMA ligation. Intraoperative ultrasound can evaluate the perfusion of the MMA near the anastomosis. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry-Registration number: ChiCTR2000041475.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.