Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532706›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2025

Comment on: Early Post-operative ECG Changes as a Predictor of Post-pericardiotomy Syndrome Following Atrial Septal Defect Repair.

Huzafa Ali

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Huzafa AliCMH Multan Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan. huzafaali66@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0944-6404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the article "Early Postoperative ECG Changes as a Predictor of Post-Pericardiotomy Syndrome Following Atrial Septal Defect Repair" by Hyberg et al. I commend the authors for their valuable insights into early ECG changes predicting postoperative complications. However, I raise several concerns regarding their study's methodology. Specifically, the use of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria without incorporating pediatric-specific criteria, such as those proposed by Heching et al. potentially limits the study's applicability to younger patients. Additionally, reliance solely on ST-segment elevation and PR segment depression for assessing pericardial inflammation overlooks the significance of Spodick's sign. The lack of a standardized timing for postoperative ECGs and the omission of independent risk factors for Post-Pericardiotomy Syndrome (PPS), including history of pericarditis and pneumonia, further limit the study's comprehensiveness. I suggest that future research should address these aspects to refine diagnostic and monitoring strategies.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresElectrocardiographyHeart Septal Defects, AtrialPostpericardiotomy SyndromeChildHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.