Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532683›Full record

ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2025

Use of Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Opinion Statement of the French Federation of Human Genetics Working Group.

Guillaume Cogan, Marie-Bérengère Troadec, Françoise Devillard, Marie-Hélène Saint-Frison, David Geneviève, François Vialard, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Delphine Héron, Tania Attie-Bitach, Alexandra Benachi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guillaume CoganDépartement de génétique médicale, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, UF de Neurogénétique Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3505-7114
Marie-Bérengère TroadecUniv Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France.
Françoise DevillardService de génétique génomique et procréation, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Marie-Hélène Saint-FrisonDépartement de génétique - UF de fœtopathologie, CHU Robert Debré, Paris, France.
David GenevièveUniversité Montpellier, Inserm U1183, centre de référence anomalies du développement et syndromes malformatifs, Service de génétique clinique, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
François VialardService de Biologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy-Saint Germain, Poissy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5774-2756
Emmanuelle Rial-SebbagCERPOP, Inserm, Toulouse Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
Delphine HéronDépartement de génétique médicale, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, UF de génétique clinique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Tania Attie-BitachService de Médecine Génomique des Maladies Rares, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandra BenachiAP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-0765
Pascale Saugier-VeberDepartment of Genetics and Reference Center for Developmental Disorders, Université Rouen Normandie, Inserm U1245 and CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.

Funding

Federation Française de Génétique Humaine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrenatal whole exome sequencing (pES) is increasingly prescribed for fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Starting from the local French prenatal medicine practice, healthcare system and legal landscape, we aimed to address the broad medical and ethical issues raised by the use of pES for women and couples as well as for prenatal care providers.

methodThe French Federation of Human Genetics established a working group composed of clinicians and biologists from all over France to discuss pES challenges. A literature review was also performed.

resultsWe emphasize the importance of non-directive information that helps couples make a decision that is consistent with their personal values and ideas. We address the difficulty of obtaining informed consent that respects the couple's autonomy, despite the complexity of the information and regardless of their level of education and cultural background. We address whether variants of uncertain significance and unsolicited results should be reported. We emphasize the need for national harmonization of access to pES and the need for multidisciplinary meetings in complex situations. We point out that the specific French context of healthcare financing and the French law have a major influence on medical care organization and support for couples. The outcome of the working group is the development of 12 proposals.

conclusionThis opinion statement, dedicated to prenatal care providers worldwide although linked to the French context, will provide food for thought and assist them in understanding the complexity and implications of pES.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleFranceGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyethicsprenatal medicineultrasonography fetal anomaly findingswhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39532683
PMCPMC11893516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.