SynthesisInternational dental journal2025
Influence of Implant Surfaces on Peri-Implant Diseases - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Detecting Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Interleukin-23 and Interleukin-17 in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid of Subjects With Peri-Implant Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of implant surface modifications on long-term outcome of surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Dental implant nanotopography for peri-implant tissue stability: soft-tissue sealing, innate immune calibration, and active biointerface regulation.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Review
- Effect of implant neck design on peri-implant tissue conditions: a narrative review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Review
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid Analysis by Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy in Peri-Implantitis-A Pilot Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Survival and Bone Remodeling in Hybrid Surface Dental Implants Placed with 3 Surgical Protocols up to 5 Years: A Retrospective Practice-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Topography-based implants for bone regeneration: Design, biological mechanism, and therapeutics.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- A multi-dimensional performance evaluation of large language models in dental implantology: comparison of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini and Qwen across diverse clinical scenarios.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current literature on the effect of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL), soft tissue periodontal parameters, peri-implantitis, and implant failure rates. MATERIALS AND
methodsRandomized controlled trials were searched in electronic databases. Risk of bias within the selected studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software for studies with similar comparisons reporting same outcome measures.
resultsTen randomized control trials were included in the present review. The primary outcome of changes in peri-implant MBL favoured implants with machined surfaces, however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .18). The changes in probing pocket depths significantly favoured the use of machined surfaces (P = .01), while the implant failure rates favoured roughened surface implants. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .09).
conclusionMachined surface implants were favoured in terms of lesser peri-implant MBL, though the difference was not significant. The analysis also demonstrated limited favourable outcomes in terms of periodontal parameters for machined surfaces, with slightly significantly better outcomes in terms of probing pocket depths. However, rough surface implants tended to display a lower implant failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.