Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532519›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2025

Prevalence of epilepsy: a population-based cohort study in Denmark with comparison to Global Burden of Disease (GBD) prevalence estimates.

Jakob Christensen, Betina B Trabjerg, Ryan G Wagner, Charles R Newton, Churl-Su Kwon, Kari Modalsli Aaberg, Eugen Trinka, Samuel Wiebe, Judith Helen Cross, Håkon Magne Vegrim and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jakob ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark jakob@farm.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-6435
Betina B TrabjergNational Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ryan G WagnerMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Charles R NewtonKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Churl-Su KwonDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Epidemiology, and the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Kari Modalsli AabergNational Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria.
Samuel WiebeDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1061-9099
Judith Helen CrossGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Håkon Magne VegrimDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Theo VosInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jaimie SteinmetzInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Julie Werenberg DreierNational Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) produces prevalence estimates for 'idiopathic epilepsy' (ie, of unknown aetiology) and 'secondary epilepsy' (ie, with known aetiology) but does not report prevalence by underlying aetiologies for 'secondary epilepsy'.

methodsWe used nationwide, population-based register data from Denmark to identify underlying causes of epilepsy and their contribution to prevalence of 'secondary epilepsy' and compared with global prevalence data from GBD 2019. We identified all persons with a hospital-based epilepsy diagnosis and a filled prescription for antiseizure medication between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Epilepsy was categorised into 'idiopathic' or 'secondary' and 'total epilepsy' as the sum of the two epilepsy categories.

resultsOn 31 December 2018, a total of 5 784 284 individuals (49.7% males) were living in Denmark including 40 336 with epilepsy (51.5% males). Perinatal conditions, traumatic brain injury, brain tumours and stroke were prominent underlying causes of 'secondary epilepsy'. The prevalence of 'total epilepsy' in Denmark was 697 (95% CI 691 to 704) per 100 000 population (264 (95% CI 260 to 269) for 'secondary epilepsy' and 433 (95% CI 428 to 438) for 'idiopathic epilepsy'). In the GBD 2019 Study, the prevalence of 'total epilepsy' in 2018 was 682 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 586 to 784) per 100 000 population (359 (95% UI 324-397) for 'secondary epilepsy' and 324 (95% UI 249 to 404) for 'idiopathic epilepsy').

conclusionsPrevalence estimates of 'total epilepsy', 'idiopathic epilepsy' and 'secondary epilepsy' in Denmark align with the GBD 2019 estimates. In future studies, it is suggested to explicitly include all types of epilepsy, including 'secondary epilepsy', which is currently estimated as sequelae (consequences) of underlying diseases.

Indexed as

EpilepsyGlobal Burden of DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedDEMENTIAEPIDEMIOLOGYEPILEPSYSTROKE

Identifiers

PMID39532519
PMCPMC12015072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.