Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532481›Full record

ReviewPhytochemical analysis : PCA2025

Integrating DNA Barcoding Within an Orthogonal Approach for Herbal Product Authentication: A Narrative Review.

Nazia Nazar, Akanksha Saxena, Anu Sebastian, Adrian Slater, Velusamy Sundaresan, Tiziana Sgamma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Phytochemical analysis : PCA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. KoreanFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nazia NazarBiomolecular Technology Group, Leicester School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Akanksha SaxenaPlant Biology and Systematics, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Research Centre, Bengaluru, India.
Anu SebastianBiomolecular Technology Group, Leicester School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Adrian SlaterBiomolecular Technology Group, Leicester School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Velusamy SundaresanPlant Biology and Systematics, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Research Centre, Bengaluru, India.
Tiziana SgammaBiomolecular Technology Group, Leicester School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-1656

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDaphne Jackson Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExisting methods for morphological, organoleptic, and chemical authentication may not adequately ensure the accurate identification of plant species or guarantee safety. Herbal raw material authentication remains a major challenge in herbal medicine. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding, combined with an orthogonal approach integrating various testing methods for quality assurance, has emerged as a new trend in plant authentication.

objectiveThe review evaluates DNA barcoding and common alternative testing in plant-related sectors to enhance quality assurance and accurate authentication.

methodStudies were selected based on their relevance to the identification, quality assurance, and safety of herbal products. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, and relevant case studies from the last two decades focused on DNA barcoding, identification methods, and their applications. Exclusion criteria involved studies lacking empirical data, those not peer-reviewed, or those unrelated to the main focus. This ensured the inclusion of high-quality, pertinent sources while excluding less relevant studies.

resultsAn orthogonal approach refers to the use of multiple, independent methods that provide complementary information for more accurate plant identification and quality assurance. This reduces false positives or negatives by confirming results through different techniques, combining DNA barcoding with morphological analysis or chemical profiling. It enhances confidence in results, particularly in cases of potential adulteration or misidentification of plant materials.

conclusionThis study highlights the persistent challenges in assuring the quality, purity, and safety of plant materials. Additionally, it stresses the importance of incorporating DNA-based authentication alongside traditional methods, to enhance plant material identification.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, PlantPlants, MedicinalQuality ControlDNA, Plantadulterationauthenticationchemical analysisDNA barcodeherbal productsmetabarcodingmini barcodingorthogonal approachquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID39532481
PMCPMC11743069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.