Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532387›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Aligning implementation research and clinical operations: a partnership to promote implementation research in primary care.

Valerie Chepp, Steven Masiano, Mario Scarcipino, Audrey Hudak, Eva Steinel, Christopher Babiuch, Anita D Misra-Hebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valerie CheppHealthcare Delivery and Implementation Science Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-1567
Steven MasianoHealthcare Delivery and Implementation Science Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mario ScarcipinoHealthcare Delivery and Implementation Science Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Audrey HudakPrimary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Eva SteinelPrimary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Christopher BabiuchPrimary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anita D Misra-HebertHealthcare Delivery and Implementation Science Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA misraa@ccf.org.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Northern Ohio, Catalyzing Linkages to Equity in Health (CLE Health)UM1TR004528 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRACE A MCCOMSEY · 2023 to 2026
$32.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rigorous evaluation of the implementation of evidence into routine practice in a health system requires strong alignment between research and clinical operational teams. Implementation researchers benefit from understanding operational processes and contextual factors when designing data collection while operational teams gain an understanding of implementation frameworks and outcomes using both qualitative and quantitative data. However, interventions to build capacity for these evaluation partnerships-particularly those tailored for clinical operational practitioners-are limited. We developed a model for a research-clinical operational partnership to build capacity for rigorous implementation evaluation. The model incorporated didactic and interactive education alongside small group discussion. Using reflective qualitative analysis, we show how the year-long partnership resulted in an effective collaboration that built capacity for rigorous operational evaluation, informed plans for data collection to include provider and patient barriers to adoption and increased awareness of implementation cost barriers. Improved capacity for implementation evaluation was demonstrated by the knowledge acquisition that resulted for both teams as a result of the collaboration and the education that penetrated to other aspects of the operational team's work beyond the immediate project. Programme successes and improvement opportunities were also identified. The partnership model shows how a formal research-clinical operational collaboration can build capacity for rigorous implementation evaluation and close the gap between implementation researchers and practitioners in a large health system. While larger-scale process evaluation is common, creating space for project-specific capacity-building initiatives, with varying levels of research involvement, can also advance the field of implementation science, offering new perspectives and partnerships, as well as opportunities to advance learning even for smaller-scale evidence translation.

Indexed as

Implementation SciencePrimary Health CareCapacity BuildingCooperative BehaviorHumansQualitative ResearchHealthcare quality improvementImplementation sciencePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39532387
PMCPMC11555095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.