ArticleBMJ open2024
Use of the walking and turning test to accurately discriminate between independently ambulatory community-dwelling older Thai adults with and without a history of falls: a retrospective diagnostic study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Current Tools for Fall Risk Assessment in Older Adults Across Southeast Asia and the Need for Culturally Adapted Models: A Scoping Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study developed and investigated the possibility of using the walking and turning test (WTT) to indicate fall risk in community-dwelling older adults.
designRetrospective diagnostic study.
settingThe study was carried out in a community setting.
participantsThe study focused on community-dwelling older Thai adults. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The participants were assessed based on demographics, fear of falls using a 'yes/no' question and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International, as well as fall data in the previous 6 months. The participants then performed the WTT, timed up and go test, five times sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength test (HG) in random order.
resultsThere were a total of 86 participants with an average age of 69.95±6.10 years (range from 60 to 88 years), most of whom were female (67.44%). 40 participants (46.51%) reported that they had fallen at least once in the previous 6 months. A comparison of various physical ability tests revealed significant differences between faller and non-faller participants (p<0.001). The outcomes of the WTT showed significant correlations with fall variables, balance and muscle strength (0.394 to 0.853, p<0.001). Based on sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve, the cut-off score of 6.40 s showed the highest level of ability to indicate falls among community-dwelling older adults, with a sensitivity of 92.50% and a specificity of 78.26%.
conclusionsThe study suggests the clinical usefulness of the WTT in determining falls in older individuals. WTT is a physical ability measurement that indicates balance ability and muscle strength. The test is practical, requires little space and equipment and can be used in large populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.