Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532373›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.

Edris Kakemam, Farzaneh Miri, Sevda Sadeghpour, Alireza Mirzaei, Jalal Saeidpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edris KakemamSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7721-6924
Farzaneh MiriDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Management and Medical Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Sevda SadeghpourClinical Research Development Unit of Tabriz Valiasr Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Alireza MirzaeiDepartment of Emergency Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-2108
Jalal SaeidpourHealth Information Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of) jalalsaeidpour@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess and compare attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals and to identify factors associated with attitudes towards patient safety.

designAn institution-based, cross-sectional survey was carried out from July to August 2023.

setting10 governmental teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

participantsThe study participants comprised a random sample of 186 nurses and 90 physicians who had worked for at least 6 months in their current hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were mean and SD scores for individual items and the nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes Toward Patient Safety Questionnaire-III. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of physicians and nurses who responded positively to each item, expressed as percentages for each group.

resultsPhysicians and nurses exhibited moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety (mean scores of 3.79±0.33 and 3.83±0.36, respectively). Both professional groups reported the most positive attitudes in the same dimensions: 'team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error' (mean scores of >4 out of 5). Conversely, the lowest scores were observed in 'importance of patient safety in the curriculum', indicating potential gaps in their understanding of patient safety (mean scores of <3.5 out of 5). Physicians displayed significantly more positive attitudes in the domain of 'error inevitability', while nurses held more positive attitudes in 'error reporting confidence' and 'disclosure responsibility' (p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the factors associated with more positive attitudes towards patient safety included lower workload (B=0.131; 95% CI 0.047 to 0.215; p=0.002), reporting of adverse events (B=0.100; 95% CI 0.009 to 0.191; p=0.030) and receiving patient safety training (B=0.134; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.249; p< 0.023).

conclusionBoth professional groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety. However, the findings highlighted the need for future patient safety training to prioritise enhancement of healthcare professionals' understanding of medical errors. Such training initiatives should be engaging and directly relevant to the specific needs of both nurses and physicians, ensuring its perceived value to their ongoing professional development. Furthermore, fostering a supportive and blame-free environment that encourages the reporting of medical errors is crucial.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHospitals, TeachingPatient SafetyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedNursesNursing Staff, HospitalPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdverse eventsHealth & safetyNursesPhysiciansPublic HospitalsQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID39532373
PMCPMC11555109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.