ArticleBMJ open2024
Research and development investment of Chinese chemical pharmaceutical companies under the national pooled procurement: a retrospective panel data analysis, 2013-2022.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technological and industrial trends in China's pharmaceutical sector.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo generate evidence about changes in the research and development (R&D) investment of Chinese chemical pharmaceutical companies before and after the implementation of the national pooled procurement, to respond to the concerns that significant price reductions might negatively affect R&D investment, and to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making for improvement of the national pooled procurement.
methodsThis retrospective study employed the fixed-effects models with robust SEs to analyse the changes in R&D investment intensities of 76 A-share listed Chinese chemical pharmaceutical companies before and after the procurement implementation in 2019. The analyses were based on a panel data set between 2013 and 2022. Subgroup analyses were conducted to account for the heterogeneity of the target companies. The bootstrap hypothesis test method was employed to assess potential variations across the different subgroups.
resultsFollowing the procurement implementation, the R&D investment intensity (RDI) of the target companies increased by 1.9% (p<0.05) compared with the RDI before the procurement implementation. Successful bidders exhibited a higher RDI of 2.2% (p<0.01) compared with that of the other suppliers. The RDI of companies engaged in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) production was found to be 2.4% lower (p<0.01) than that of companies not involved in TCM production. Similarly, the companies engaged in the production of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) had a 1.6% lower (p<0.01) RDI than those not involved in API production.
conclusionsThis study found that the enthusiasm of Chinese chemical medicines companies towards investing in R&D following the medicines regulatory reforms was not suppressed when the pilot pooled procurement was expanded and continued. The overall level of RDI following the pilot was higher than that before the pilot during the entire observation period. The enhanced investment in R&D has been a distinctive feature of Chinese chemical pharmaceutical companies that position themselves with more substantial market competitiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.