ReviewMagnetic resonance imaging2025
Detection challenges of temporal encephaloceles in epilepsy: A retrospective analysis.
Review in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Congenital encephalomeningocele presenting as a giant orbital mass in a neonate: a case report.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal encephaloceles (TEs) are herniations of cerebral parenchyma through structural defects in the floor of the middle cranial fossa. They are a relatively common, but only relatively recently identified potential cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Uncontrolled epilepsy is associated with many negative long term health consequences including a heightened risk of death. The most effective treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy is surgery. One of the most predictive factors associated with successful surgery is identification of an abnormality on imaging. However, TEs can be difficult to detect and are often overlooked on neuroimaging studies. Improving our ability to accurately detect TEs by MRI is an important step in improving surgical outcomes in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We performed a review on existing imaging modalities for detecting TEs and report on our attempt to use a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) algorithm to detect TEs in T1-weighted MRIs of 81 patients from a database comprised of 25 patients with confirmed encephaloceles and 56 controls. Our program's sensitivity and specificity were compared to those of two neuroradiologists and two epileptologists using visualization during surgery as the gold standard. On average, the neuroradiologists and epileptologists had sensitivities of 41 % and 58 % and specificities of 81 % and 60 % while our VBM-based approach had sensitivities and specificities ranging from 11 % to 50 % and 0.2 % to 17 %, respectively. This work provides an overview of the different imaging modalities utilized in the detection of TEs and highlights the difficulties associated with their detection for both experienced physicians and cutting-edge computational methods. Our findings suggest that VBM-based methods could potentially be used to enhance clinicians' ability to detect TEs thereby facilitating surgical planning, improving surgical outcomes by allowing for more specific targeting, and bettering the long-term health and well-being of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy secondary to TEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.