Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532146›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Pulsed artificial light at night alters moth flight behaviour.

Madeleine Fabusova, Kevin J Gaston, Jolyon Troscianko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madeleine FabusovaCentre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-2454-0265
Kevin J GastonEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-7928
Jolyon TrosciankoCentre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-2594

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicle headlights create pulsed artificial light at night (pALAN) that is unpredictable, intense and extends into previously dark areas. Nocturnal insects often have remarkable low-light vision, but their slow pupillary light responses may leave them vulnerable to pALAN, which has important ecological consequences. To test this, we exposed nocturnal moths-important pollinators and prey-to four pALAN treatments. These comprised 'cool' and 'warm' lights, either emitted from phosphor-coated light-emitting diodes (LEDs) or RGB (red-green-blue) LEDs, matched in colour (CCT) and intensity to human vision. We assessed the initial behavioural response, likely crucial to the survival of an organism, of 428 wild-caught moths comprising 64 species. We found that exposure to a cool phosphor-coated LED light pulse increased instances of erratic flight and flight-to-light that are likely detrimental as they increase the risks of impact with a vehicle, predation or excess energy expenditure. Our findings suggest that pALAN can cause a wide range of behavioural responses in nocturnal moths, but that the most harmful effects could be minimized by reversing the current shift towards high CCT (cool) phosphor-coated LED car headlights. Lower CCT or RGB alternatives are likely to provide benefits for road safety while reducing ecological harm.

Indexed as

DarknessFlight, AnimalLightingMothsAnimalsHumansLightPhototaxisRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cellsartificial light at nightflight behaviourheadlightsmothspulsed light

Identifiers

PMID39532146
PMCPMC11557245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.