Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532138›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Structural disorder facilitates future memory decisions.

Michaela Bocheva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Structural disorder facilitates future memory decisions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michaela BochevaSofia University 'St. Kliment Ohridski', Sofia 1504, Bulgaria.ORCID 0009-0004-8025-8323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that perception and cognition are systematically biased towards the recent past. That is, a decision about the current state of a perceptual feature (e.g. orientation) can be predicted based on a recent state of the same feature. Such serial dependencies have been demonstrated across perception, memory and cognition, and have been jointly attributed to an adaptive mechanism meant to promote stability in a constantly changing environment. Here, we argue that this adaptive mechanism prioritizes past information on the most basic structural level, such that the strength of the attractive bias is modulated by the amount of structural coherence in stimuli. We presented visual patterns of varied structural disorder (randomness) prior to a recognition memory decision that required discriminating between trained and novel visual patterns. Both highly generic geometrical shapes and completely random patterns failed to elicit an effect on decisional response times. By contrast, we found recognition memory decisions to be significantly faster in trials where the irrelevant probe pattern was 'optimally' random. This result suggests that decision-making is influenced by the past's informational worth. More importantly, it suggests an optimal amount of uncertainty to facilitate future decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemoryPhotic StimulationReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionYoung Adultrecognition memoryserial dependencevisual perceptionvisual priming

Identifiers

PMID39532138
PMCPMC11557226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.