Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532129›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024

Global and local identifiability analysis of a nonlinear biphasic constitutive model in confined compression.

John M Peloquin, Dawn M Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M PeloquinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7145-6476
Dawn M ElliottDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-1029

Funding

NIAMS NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of biomechanical models relies on model parameters estimated from experimental data. Parameter non-identifiability, when the same model output can be produced by many sets of parameter values, introduces severe errors yet has received relatively little attention in biomechanics and is subtle enough to remain unnoticed in the absence of deliberate verification. The present work develops a global identifiability analysis method in which cluster analysis and singular value decomposition are applied to vectors of parameter-output variable correlation coefficients. This method provides a visual representation of which specific experimental design elements are beneficial or harmful in terms of parameter identifiability, supporting the correction of deficiencies in the test protocol prior to testing physical specimens. The method was applied to a representative nonlinear biphasic model for cartilaginous tissue, demonstrating that confined compression data does not provide identifiability for the biphasic model parameters. This result was confirmed by two independent analyses: local analysis of the Hessian of a sum-of-squares error cost function and observation of the behaviour of two optimization algorithms. Therefore, confined compression data are insufficient for the calibration of general-purpose biphasic models. Identifiability analysis by these or other methods is strongly recommended when planning future experiments.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaCompressive StrengthHumansNonlinear Dynamicscartilageconfined compressionidentifiability analysisparameter estimationsoft tissue mechanics

Identifiers

PMID39532129
PMCPMC11557236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.