Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39532025›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of food microbiology2025

Accumulation of microbial hazards and assessment of food hygiene associated with broiler chicken processing at open air food markets in Maputo, Mozambique.

Frederica Lamar, Amélia Mondlane-Milisse, Denise R A Brito, Hermógenes N Mucache, Kelsey J Jesser, Christine S Fagnant-Sperati, Courtney Victor, Kayoko Shioda, José M Fafetine, Joaquim Ângelo Osvaldo Saíde and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of food microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Frederica LamarGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Amélia Mondlane-MilisseBiotechnology Center, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Denise R A BritoBiotechnology Center, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Hermógenes N MucacheVeterinary Faculty, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Kelsey J JesserDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351618, 2980 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Christine S Fagnant-SperatiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351618, 2980 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Courtney VictorGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Kayoko ShiodaDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA; Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
José M FafetineVeterinary Faculty, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique; Biotechnology Center, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Joaquim Ângelo Osvaldo SaídeBiotechnology Center, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Eric M FèvreInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, CH64 7TE, United Kingdom; International Livestock Research Institute, Old Naivasha Road, PO, Box 30709, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Mia Catharine MattioliGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Karen LevyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351618, 2980 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Matthew C FreemanGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: matthew.freeman@emory.edu.

Funding

Environmetal Pathology/Toxicology Training ProgramT32ES007032 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAUSTMAN, ELAINE M, ROSENFELD, MICHAEL E · 1985 to 2023
$10.7M
Graduate and Postdoctoral Training in ToxicologyT32ES012870 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2004 to 2026
$9.1M
Infectious Diseases Across Scales Training ProgramT32AI138952 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jacobus de Roode · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI138952NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007032NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES012870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burden of foodborne disease due to the consumption of animal-sourced foods is substantial in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Open air markets, while providing fresh and affordable foods, often have unhygienic practices that may contribute to contamination during the slaughter and processing of chicken meat. This study examines whether and how the common practice of rinse water (stored water used for rinsing broiler carcasses during processing) reuse leads to accumulation of pathogens, with potential cross contamination of chicken meat. To assess the accumulation of Campylobacter jejuni/coli, Salmonella spp., and the indicator of fecal contamination, Escherichia coli, in rinse water used during the slaughtering process at open air food markets in Maputo, Mozambique. We conducted a time-series study at three open air food markets. In a first experiment, we collected paired rinse water (N = 70), water used for chicken processing, and broiler chicken carcass (N = 60) samples from 10 vendors at 75-min intervals starting prior to any processing activity. In a second experiment, we collected 100, 50 mL rinse water samples, immediately before and after processing, from 10 vendors. Chicken processing activity and associated hygiene practices were captured through direct observation. Vendors processed 24 chickens per day, on average. In the first experiment, C. jejuni/coli and E. coli were detected in 30 % and 80 % of rinse water samples, respectively, prior to processing (baseline), and no Salmonella was detected. After the first carcass rinse, C. jejuni/coli and E. coli were detected in 100 % of samples, and Salmonella spp. was detected in 42 % of rinse water samples and 48 % of carcass samples. C. jejuni/coli showed an average 0.1 log

Indexed as

ChickensEscherichia coliFood ContaminationFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyHygieneMeatAnimalsCampylobacter jejuniHumansMozambiqueSalmonellaChicken processingC. jejuni/coliE. coliOpen air food marketsSalmonella spp.

Identifiers

PMID39532025
PMCPMC11612030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.