ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
Diversity of Transcriptional Regulatory Adaptation in E. coli.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- iModulonMiner 2.0: multi-modality modularization of prokaryotic bulk, single-cell, and community omics data.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- The transcriptional regulatory network of the Escherichia coli MG1655 reference strain.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Fine-tuned GPT-based foundation models effectively reconstruct bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks from literature.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) in bacteria is thought to rapidly evolve in response to selection pressures, modulating transcription factor (TF) activities and interactions. In order to probe the limits and mechanisms surrounding the short-term adaptability of the TRN, we generated, evolved, and characterized knockout (KO) strains in Escherichia coli for 11 regulators selected based on measured growth impact on glucose minimal media. All but one knockout strain (Δlrp) were able to recover growth and did so requiring few convergent mutations. We found that the TF knockout adaptations could be divided into four categories: (i) Strains (ΔargR, ΔbasR, Δlon, ΔzntR, and Δzur) that recovered growth without any regulator-specific adaptations, likely due to minimal activity of the regulator on the growth condition, (ii) Strains (ΔcytR, ΔmlrA, and ΔybaO) that recovered growth without TF-specific mutations but with differential expression of regulators with overlapping regulons to the KO'ed TF, (iii) Strains (Δcrp and Δfur) that recovered growth using convergent mutations within their regulatory networks, including regulated promoters and connected regulators, and (iv) Strains (Δlrp) that were unable to fully recover growth, seemingly due to the broad connectivity of the TF within the TRN. Analyzing growth capabilities in evolved and unevolved strains indicated that growth adaptation can restore fitness to diverse substrates often despite a lack of TF-specific mutations. This work reveals the breadth of TRN adaptive mechanisms and suggests these mechanisms can be anticipated based on the network and functional context of the perturbed TFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.