ArticleJCO oncology practice2025
Clinical Management of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: A Survey of Members of ASCO.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Three-monthly gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- A Telemedicine-Supported Home-Injection Model for Patients With Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
- Ovarian function suppression decision-making and uptake in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a mixed methods analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Remodeling the tumor dormancy ecosystem to prevent recurrence and metastasis.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Surgical Ovarian Suppression and Breast Cancer-What Do We Know About It?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Evaluation and management of incomplete ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving anti-hormone therapy.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- A mixed-methods study characterizing experiences of medical oncologists' use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for treatment of breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of leuprorelin (BoennuokangFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Physician treatment decisions for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer in young patients: a Latin American survey.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOvarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) is a standard of care for premenopausal patients with high-risk stage II/III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Practical guidance on the optimal choice of GnRHa, timing, schedule, and monitoring is limited. Our aim was to determine how oncologists use OFS in routine care.
methodsWe designed a questionnaire to determine the choice of GnRHa, schedule, duration, initiation, use of bone modifiers, and monitoring of estradiol (E2). The questionnaire was sent to oncologists treating BC, in practice for >1 year and participating in the ASCO Research Survey Pool (RSP). It was also forwarded by investigators to oncologists meeting these criteria. The survey was open between November 14, 2023, and January 5, 2024.
resultsOf 996 oncologists participating in the ASCO RSP, 178 (18%) completed the survey. An additional 56 oncologists contacted by investigators responded. Respondents were from the United States (57%), Asia (15%), and Europe (14%). Goserelin (54%) and leuprolide (39%) were the most frequently used GnRHas and were administered once every month by 46%. Approaches to starting GnRHas were varied. Most continued them for the duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy (57%). Estradiol monitoring was performed regularly, sometimes, or never by 43%, 27%, and 27%, respectively. The E2 assays used were standard (65%), ultrasensitive (16%), and unknown (14%). Interpreting E2 assay results were considered difficult by 55%; however, 62% of oncologists changed treatment on the basis of them. A total of 92% of respondents would like ASCO guidance on the practical use of OFS.
conclusionConsiderable practice variation exists for similar clinical scenarios in OFS administration. Respondents would welcome ASCO guidance on all aspects of OFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.