ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Implantable 3D printed hydrogels with intrinsic channels for liver tissue engineering.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated mesenchymal and extracellular cues drive bioengineered liver tissue formation and function.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Dormancy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Tissue Engineering Opportunities forTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review on Artificial Liver for Implantation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Microfluidic technologies for wearable and implantable biomedical devices.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the design, fabrication, and evaluation of a general platform for the creation of three-dimensional printed devices (3DPDs) for tissue engineering applications. As a demonstration, we modeled the liver with 3DPDs consisting of a pair of parallel millifluidic channels that function as portal-venous (PV) and hepatobiliary (HB) structures. Perfusion of medium or whole blood through the PV channel supports the hepatocyte-containing HB channel. Device computer-aided design was optimized for structural stability, after which 3DPDs were 3D printed in a polyethylene(glycol) diacrylate photoink by digital light processing and evaluated in vitro. The HB channels were subsequently seeded with hepatic cells suspended in a collagen hydrogel. Perfusion of 3DPDs in bioreactors enhanced the viability and function of rat hepatoma cells and were maintained over time, along with improved liver-specific functions. Similar results were observed with primary rat hepatocytes, including significant upregulation of cytochrome p450 activity. Additionally, coculture experiments involving primary rat hepatocytes, endothelial cells, and mesenchymal stem cells in 3DPDs showed enhanced viability, broad liver-specific gene expression, and histological features indicative of liver tissue architecture. In vivo implantation of 3DPDs in a rat renal shunt model demonstrated successful blood flow through the devices without clot formation and maintenance of cell viability. 3D printed designs can be scaled in 3D space, allowing for larger devices with increased cell mass. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of 3DPDs for clinical translation in hepatic support applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.