ArticlePloS one2024
Comparison of the protein composition of isolated extracellular vesicles from mouse brain and dissociated brain cell culture medium.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conserved and Tissue-Specific RNA and Protein Cargos of Small Extracellular Vesicles From 120 Tissue Sites Across 34 Organs in a Single Pig.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Immunoaffinity-Based Protocol to Enrich Nervous System Cell-, Lung Alveolar Cell-, and Hepatocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles From Human Plasma.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Signal recognition particle-dependent secretome in humans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tissue-derived extracellular vesicles: comparing Ts-EVs and Te-EVs in extraction, characteristics and research trends.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles for targeted drug delivery: advances in surface modification strategies and therapeutic applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Protocol for the isolation and characterization of porcine brain region-associated extracellular particles.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a crucial role in intercellular communication. Characterizing EV protein composition is essential to understand EV function(s). Isolating EVs from cell culture medium is a common approach to study EVs, but it remains unclear whether EVs isolated from in vitro conditions accurately reflect physiological conditions of the same source in vivo tissues. Here, we analyzed the protein composition of EVs isolated from freshly dissected mouse forebrain and primary dissociated mouse forebrain culture medium. In total, 3,204 and 3,583 proteins were identified in EVs isolated in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Among the proteins identified from both EV sources, there was substantial overlap (~86%). While the overall proteome compositions were very similar, in vitro EVs were relatively enriched with transmembrane/GPI-anchored membrane and cytosolic proteins (MISEV2023 category 1 and 2) typically associated with EVs. Conversely, while both in vivo and in vitro EVs express likely non-EV proteins (MISEV2023 category 3), the in vivo samples were significantly more enriched with these probable contaminants, specifically ribosomal proteins. Our findings highlight that in vitro EVs may be representative of in vivo EVs when isolated from the same source tissue using similar methodology; however, each population of EVs have differences in both total and, primarily, relative protein expression likely due to differing levels of co-eluting contaminants. Therefore, these points must be considered when interpreting results of EV studies further suggesting that improved methods of isolation to reduce non-EV contaminants should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.