Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparison of the protein composition of isolated extracellular vesicles from mouse brain and dissociated brain cell culture medium.

Zan Xu, Joshua Brian Foster, Rashelle Lashley, Xueqin Wang, Albert John Muhleman, Christopher Eli Masters, Chien-Liang Glenn Lin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zan XuDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Joshua Brian FosterDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Rashelle LashleyDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Xueqin WangDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Albert John MuhlemanDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Christopher Eli MastersDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Chien-Liang Glenn LinDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Acquisition of a Next Generation Orbitrap MSS10OD018056 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FREITAS, MICHAEL A. · 2014 to 2014
$573k
Target identification of small molecule LDN/OSU-215111R21AG066059 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, CHIEN-LIANG GLENN · 2020 to 2020
$457k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIA NIH HHS R21 AG066059NIH HHS S10 OD018056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a crucial role in intercellular communication. Characterizing EV protein composition is essential to understand EV function(s). Isolating EVs from cell culture medium is a common approach to study EVs, but it remains unclear whether EVs isolated from in vitro conditions accurately reflect physiological conditions of the same source in vivo tissues. Here, we analyzed the protein composition of EVs isolated from freshly dissected mouse forebrain and primary dissociated mouse forebrain culture medium. In total, 3,204 and 3,583 proteins were identified in EVs isolated in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Among the proteins identified from both EV sources, there was substantial overlap (~86%). While the overall proteome compositions were very similar, in vitro EVs were relatively enriched with transmembrane/GPI-anchored membrane and cytosolic proteins (MISEV2023 category 1 and 2) typically associated with EVs. Conversely, while both in vivo and in vitro EVs express likely non-EV proteins (MISEV2023 category 3), the in vivo samples were significantly more enriched with these probable contaminants, specifically ribosomal proteins. Our findings highlight that in vitro EVs may be representative of in vivo EVs when isolated from the same source tissue using similar methodology; however, each population of EVs have differences in both total and, primarily, relative protein expression likely due to differing levels of co-eluting contaminants. Therefore, these points must be considered when interpreting results of EV studies further suggesting that improved methods of isolation to reduce non-EV contaminants should be further investigated.

Indexed as

BrainCulture MediaExtracellular VesiclesAnimalsCells, CulturedMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProsencephalonProteomeProteomicsCulture MediaProteome

Identifiers

PMID39531446
PMCPMC11556680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.