Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531319›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation

Evaluation of Visual Disturbances After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-A One-Year Follow-up Study.

Möller Mona-Lisa, Mäki Kaisa, Nybo Taina, Huovinen Antti, Marinkovic Ivan, Melkas Susanna, Johansson Jan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Möller Mona-LisaAuthor Affiliations: Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (Mrs Möller, Mr Huovinen, Mr Marinkovic, and Mrs Melkas); Department of Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (Mrs Mäki and Mrs Nybo); and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (Johansson).
Mäki Kaisa
Nybo Taina
Huovinen Antti
Marinkovic Ivan
Melkas Susanna
Johansson Jan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the persistence of visual symptoms in mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) during the first months after injury. It is important to recognize visual disturbances because they can delay return to normal activities, while they might be simultaneously treated by visual therapy. Here we describe the results from a 1-year follow-up study of visual disturbances after MTBI. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASURES: The study group comprised 26 patients from the Brain Injury Clinic of the Helsinki University Hospital. Inclusion criterion was a high score (≥21p) on the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) at an appointment with a neurologist within 6 months after injury. The patients underwent baseline vision evaluation at 4 months on average and follow-up at 14 months after injury. The evaluation included tests for visual acuity, near point of convergence, convergence facility, near point of accommodation, accommodative facility, motility, heterophoria, binocular vision, dynamic visual acuity, and fusional vergence width at near and far distances. Further assessments included the Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire for posttraumatic symptoms, a visual analog scale for visual fatigue, and the Developmental Eye Movement Test for saccadic eye movements.

resultsBoth CISS and Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire scores improved significantly from baseline to follow-up. The overall level of visual fatigue according to visual analog scale score was lower at follow-up, but the increase in visual fatigue (comparing fatigue before and after assessment session) was significant both at baseline and follow-up. In visual function assessments, spontaneous recovery from baseline to follow-up could be seen in vergence facility and pursuit eye movement but not in near point of convergence, near fusion, distance fusion, heterophoria, and dynamic visual acuity.

conclusionThe results point out the importance of evaluation of visual disturbances after MTBI. Early detection of these disturbances may provide an opportunity to provide visual therapy.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionVision DisordersAdultFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsVisual AcuityYoung Adultconcussionmild traumatic brain injuryvision assessmentvision evaluationvisual disturbances

Identifiers

PMID39531319
PMCPMC12594135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.