Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531288›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2024

Impact of Consumer Wearables Data on Pediatric Surgery Clinicians' Management: Multi-Institutional Scenario-Based Usability Study.

Michela Carter, Samuel C Linton, Suhail Zeineddin, J Benjamin Pitt, Christopher De Boer, Angie Figueroa, Ankush Gosain, David Lanning, Aaron Lesher, Saleem Islam and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Improving Early Prediction of Abnormal Recovery after Appendectomy in Children using Real-world Data from Wearables.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michela CarterDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-1351
Samuel C LintonDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0181-4105
Suhail ZeineddinDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-8433
J Benjamin PittDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-5402
Christopher De BoerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-9920
Angie FigueroaDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-3807
Ankush GosainDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0428-1503
David LanningDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4029-3251
Aaron LesherDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-3770
Saleem IslamDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0247-6286
Chethan SathyaDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4846-7673
Jane L HollDepartment of Neurology and Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2934-1672
Hassan Mk GhomrawiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-5278
Fizan AbdullahDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-2476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, parents lack objective methods to evaluate their child's postoperative recovery following discharge from the hospital. As a result, clinicians are dependent upon a parent's subjective assessment of the child's health status and the child's ability to communicate their symptoms. This subjective nature of home monitoring contributes to unnecessary emergency department (ED) use as well as delays in treatment. However, the integration of data remotely collected using a consumer wearable device has the potential to provide clinicians with objective metrics for postoperative patients to facilitate informed longitudinal, remote assessment.

objectiveThis multi-institutional study aimed to evaluate the impact of adding actual and simulated objective recovery data that were collected remotely using a consumer wearable device to simulated postoperative telephone encounters on clinicians' management.

methodsIn total, 3 simulated telephone scenarios of patients after an appendectomy were presented to clinicians at 5 children's hospitals. Each scenario was then supplemented with wearable data concerning or reassuring against a postoperative complication. Clinicians rated their likelihood of ED referral before and after the addition of wearable data to evaluate if it changed their recommendation. Clinicians reported confidence in their decision-making.

resultsIn total, 34 clinicians participated. Compared with the scenario alone, the addition of reassuring wearable data resulted in a decreased likelihood of ED referral for all 3 scenarios (P<.01). When presented with concerning wearable data, there was an increased likelihood of ED referral for 1 of 3 scenarios (P=.72, P=.17, and P<.001). At the institutional level, there was no difference between the 5 institutions in how the wearable data changed the likelihood of ED referral for all 3 scenarios. With the addition of wearable data, 76% (19/25) to 88% (21/24 and 22/25) of clinicians reported increased confidence in their recommendations.

conclusionsThe addition of wearable data to simulated telephone scenarios for postdischarge patients who underwent pediatric surgery impacted clinicians' remote patient management at 5 pediatric institutions and increased clinician confidence. Wearable devices are capable of providing real-time measures of recovery, which can be used as a postoperative monitoring tool to reduce delays in care and avoidable health care use.

Indexed as

appendectomychildrenconsultationminimally invasive surgerypediatric hospitalpediatric surgerypostoperative careremoteremote simulation studytelehealthwearable device

Identifiers

PMID39531288
PMCPMC11599887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.