Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531255›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Chemical Analysis and Flavor Distribution of Electronic Cigarettes in Australian Schools.

Caitlin Jenkins, Fraser Powrie, Celine Kelso, Jody Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caitlin JenkinsMolecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-6350
Fraser PowrieNSW Ministry of Health, Centre for Population Health, Tobacco and e-Cigarette Control Unit, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Celine KelsoMolecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0032-9650
Jody MorganMolecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5493-849X

Funding

Faculty of Science, Medicine and HealthMinistry of HealthUniversity of Wollongong
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescent usage of electronic cigarettes has increased globally. Inconsistent, or absent, labeling of nicotine and other ingredients requires chemical analysis to accurately determine the chemical composition of these products. AIMS AND

methodsElectronic cigarettes confiscated from public and private high school students (N = 598) were provided for analysis from three regions in New South Wales, Australia. The products were examined for brand, model, and flavor and a subset was further analyzed for chemical composition (n = 410) quantifying nicotine, synthetic cooling agents, flavoring chemicals, and prohibited ingredients by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

resultsThe majority of samples provided were fruit-flavored disposable e-cigarettes across three main brands (IGET, HQD, and Gunnpod). Nicotine was quantified in 97.3% of disposable samples with an average concentration of 40.0 mg/mL, while one refill e-liquid was found to contain nicotine at a low concentration. Almost all samples contained the coolant WS-23 in relatively high concentrations compared to other flavoring chemicals present. Chemicals prohibited under the TGO110 (Australian e-cigarette product standard) were identified in 3.4% of the samples which were chemically analyzed. This included the presence of ethylene glycol in moderately high concentrations (up to 13.2 mg/mL).

conclusionsAustralian students' preferences for fruity, disposable e-cigarettes were identified regardless of region with the vast majority containing high concentrations of nicotine. WS-23 was found in most disposable e-cigarettes, potentially to reduce throat irritation from nicotine and other flavoring chemicals. The inhalational safety of the samples is of concern due to health risks associated with detected prohibited compounds, particularly ethylene glycol. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to quantify nicotine, coolants, and flavoring chemicals in e-cigarette products seized from Australian high school students and has significant implications for future policy development. Students appear to be almost exclusively using disposable e-cigarettes with high nicotine concentrations and predominately fruity flavors. WS-23 may potentially be added to disposable e-cigarettes to facilitate the uptake of these products by adolescents unaccustomed to the throat irritation from nicotine and intense flavors. The e-cigarette coils were found to have degraded over time, potentially affecting the composition of the aerosol and leaching of metals.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsNicotineAdolescentAustraliaFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleNew South WalesSchoolsStudentsVapingFlavoring AgentsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID39531255
PMCPMC12095807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.