ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Assessing the Use of a Training Model Using Immersive Virtual Reality for Sacrospinous Fixation Surgery: A Pilot Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching Vaginal Surgery Through Simulation.O&G open · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Training in Urogynecology: The Way Forward.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisSacrospinous fixation (SSF) is a surgical complex procedure for uterovaginal prolapse that may result in pudendal plexus and vascular damage. The objective was to evaluate a training model using virtual reality to perform SSF.
methodsWe conducted a prospective single-center pilot study in the university's academic innovation department in November 2023. We recruited 20 participants, 10 gynecology resident surgeons (group 1) and 10 experienced gynecology surgeons (group 2).
resultsThe mean age was 26.6 ± 0.6 years in group 1 and 39.7 ± 3.1 years in group 2. The satisfaction rate reached 90% in both groups. A scale from 1 to 4 (1 = not-at-all, 4 = completely) was used to assess participants' perceptions. The realism of the simulation was rated at 3.3 ± 0.1 in group 1 and 3.5 ± 0.2 in group 2 (p = 0.41), the haptic feedback was rated at 2.0 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.3 (p = 0.66), the mean exercise time was 6.4 ± 1.3 min and 4.8 ± 0.7 min (p = 0.58), and the mean success rate was 70.8 ± 3.2% and 83.5 ± 6.8% (p = 0.14). In group 2, left and right instruments were placed at 2.6 ± 0.8 mm and 2.9 ± 0.7 mm from the target respectively, and in group 1 at 4.8 ± 0.7 mm and 3.8 ± 0.5 mm respectively. Participants reported greater comfort in performing sacrospinous fixation after simulation training (3.0 ± 0.2 versus 2.3 ± 0.3, p = 0.17).
conclusionOur virtual reality simulation model is feasible and accurate for SSF training for both residents and experienced surgeons with a high level of satisfaction. Virtual reality simulation improves technical skills and promotes surgical comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39531214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.