Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531198›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025

Stemness of Cancer: A Study of Triple-negative Breast Cancer From a Neuroscience Perspective.

Mustafa B A Djamgoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mustafa B A DjamgozDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. m.djamgoz@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-8540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stemness, giving cancer cells massive plasticity enabling them to survive in dynamic (e.g. hypoxic) environments and become resistant to treatment, especially chemotherapy, is an important property of aggressive tumours. Here, we review some essentials of cancer stemness focusing on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive form of all breast cancers. TNBC cells express a range of genes and mechanisms associated with stemness, including the fundamental four "Yamanaka factors". Most of the evidence concerns the transcription factor / oncogene c-Myc and an interesting case is the expression of the neonatal splice variant of voltage-gated sodium channel subtype Nav1.5. On the whole, measures that reduce the stemness make cancer cells less aggressive, reducing their invasive/metastatic potential and increasing/restoring their chemosensitivity. Such measures include gene silencing techniques, epigenetic therapies as well as novel approaches like optogenetics aiming to modulate the plasma membrane voltage. Indeed, simply hyperpolarizing their membrane potential can make stem cells differentiate. Finally, we give an overview of the clinical aspects and exploitation of cancer/TNBC stemness, including diagnostics and therapeutics. In particular, personalised mRNA-based therapies and mechanistically meaningful combinations are promising and the emerging discipline of 'cancer neuroscience' is providing novel insights to both fundamental issues and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Stem CellsNeurosciencesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansAntibodyAutoantibodyBioelectricityDiagnosticsDrug resistanceElectrotherapyEpigeneticsHypoxiaIon channelNeuroscienceOncofoetalSplicingTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39531198
PMCPMC11872763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.