ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025
Stemness of Cancer: A Study of Triple-negative Breast Cancer From a Neuroscience Perspective.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulatory Effects of Bioactive Phytoconstituents on the Amplitude and Gating Properties of Membrane Ion Channels.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The influence of neuro-tumor interactions on tumorigenesis and therapeutic response.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- The role of pluripotency regulators in triple-negative breast cancer immune response.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Role of Functional Ion Channels in Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) and Their Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stemness, giving cancer cells massive plasticity enabling them to survive in dynamic (e.g. hypoxic) environments and become resistant to treatment, especially chemotherapy, is an important property of aggressive tumours. Here, we review some essentials of cancer stemness focusing on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive form of all breast cancers. TNBC cells express a range of genes and mechanisms associated with stemness, including the fundamental four "Yamanaka factors". Most of the evidence concerns the transcription factor / oncogene c-Myc and an interesting case is the expression of the neonatal splice variant of voltage-gated sodium channel subtype Nav1.5. On the whole, measures that reduce the stemness make cancer cells less aggressive, reducing their invasive/metastatic potential and increasing/restoring their chemosensitivity. Such measures include gene silencing techniques, epigenetic therapies as well as novel approaches like optogenetics aiming to modulate the plasma membrane voltage. Indeed, simply hyperpolarizing their membrane potential can make stem cells differentiate. Finally, we give an overview of the clinical aspects and exploitation of cancer/TNBC stemness, including diagnostics and therapeutics. In particular, personalised mRNA-based therapies and mechanistically meaningful combinations are promising and the emerging discipline of 'cancer neuroscience' is providing novel insights to both fundamental issues and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.