ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2024
Exploring structural variances in monatomic metallic glasses using machine learning and molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextBCC and FCC metals have different glass-forming abilities (GFA) and exhibit different characteristics during the glass transition. However, the structural origin of their different GFAs is still not clear. Here, we explored the structures of eight monatomic metallic glasses by combining molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML). Our findings reveal that, despite their common long-range disordered atomic structure, metallic glasses can be further classified into two distinct categories indicating an underlying structural order within the disorder. Using machine learning, we found that BCC liquids can sample more diverse glass states than FCC liquids. Furthermore, glasses formed from BCC metals (GFFBs) exhibit a higher degree of disorder than glasses formed from FCC metals (GFFFs). These findings highlight the inherent differences between GFFFs and GFFBs, which help explain the different glass-forming abilities of FCC and BCC metals. Additionally, our results demonstrate the promising potential of computer vision and ML methods in exploring material structures.
methodClassical molecular dynamics simulations were employed to generate configurations of GFFBs and GFFFs, and the simulations were performed using the LAMMPS code. Inter-atomic interactions were described using a classical embedded atom model (EAM) potential. The initial configuration of the model consists of 32,000 atoms in a three-dimensional (3D) cubic box with periodic boundary conditions applied in all three directions. For machine learning, we utilized an unsupervised machine learning method along with MobileNetV2 for classifying glass structures. Image entropy and image distances were used to measure the structural differences of the metallic glasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39531143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.