Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Association between mammographic breast density and outcome in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the relationship between mammographic breast density and tumor response and outcome at follow-up, in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
methodsA total of 228 women (mean age, 47.6 years ± 10 [SD]; range: 24-74 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent NACT were included in this observational retrospective study. Clinical, radiological and histopatological data were retrieved. Categorization of breast density was performed by two radiologists in consensus on mammography acquired at the time of diagnosis according to BI-RADS categories. Association between density categories and tumor response was analyzed in the overall population and in subgroups defined by menopausal status, tumor phenotype and stage at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to estimate the OS and DFS probabilities. Subgroup analyses based on menopausal status and tumor phenotype were performed.
resultsA total of 30 patients (13.2%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). No association between density categories and pCR was found (P = 0.973), even at subgroups analysis. The median follow-up time was 92 months. Patients with dense breast showed the longest DFS (P = 0.0094), results confirmed in premenopausal patients (P = 0.0024) and in triple negative breast cancers (P = 0.0292). Density category did not show a statistically significant association with OS.
conclusionBreast cancer patients receiving NACT with extremely dense breasts showed better DFS. No evidence of breast density as a predictive marker for complete pathological response or as a prognostic factor in terms of OS was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39531133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.