Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531132›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2025

A roadmap to reduce the incidence and mortality of breast cancer by rethinking our approach to women's health.

Katherine Leggat-Barr, Douglas Yee, Erin Duralde, Caroline Hodge, Virginia Borges, Molly Baxter, Jessica Valdez, Tamandra Morgan, Judy Garber, Laura Esserman

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine Leggat-BarrTufts Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Douglas YeeMasonic Cancer Center Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Erin DuraldeOne Medical, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Caroline HodgeDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Virginia BorgesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Molly BaxterJohns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica ValdezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tamandra MorganDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Judy GarberDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura EssermanDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. laura.esserman@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-4568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress, breast cancer remains the most feared disease among women. In the USA alone, the incidence is now almost 300,000 new cancers per year, a rate that has nearly doubled in the last 30 years. Most women survive, but over 40,000 women a year still die of their disease [99]. It is the most diagnosed cancer among women and the second leading cause of cancer death. Important disparities exist in breast cancer outcomes among African American women, where women die of breast cancer at higher rates, are diagnosed younger, and at a more advanced stage. We are proposing a radical shift in our thinking about breast cancer prevention with an aspiration to dramatically lower breast cancer incidence. Most breast cancers are driven by steroid hormones. Throughout the life course, women are offered an array of hormonal treatments for menstrual cycle control, family planning, in vitro fertilization, postpartum weaning, and menopausal symptom management. There are mixed data on the extent to which each of these may contribute to increased or decreased risk for breast cancer. These endocrine manipulations could represent a great opportunity to potentially reduce breast cancer incidence and improve quality of life for survivors. To date, they have not been designed to explicitly reduce breast cancer risk. A new holistic approach will require scientists, drug developers, breast oncologists, obstetricians, gynecologists, endocrinologists, radiologists, and family medicine/internists to work together toward the common goal of reducing breast cancer risk while addressing other critical issues in women's health.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsWomen's HealthFemaleHumansIncidenceQuality of LifeRisk FactorsBreast cancerBreast cancer riskHormonal interventions

Identifiers

PMID39531132
PMCPMC11785669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.