ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic HER2-Low Breast Cancer Who Have Received Prior Chemotherapy.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Unveiled: Bridging Science, Treatment Strategy, and Economic Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn 2021, breast cancer affected 75,619 women in Denmark. Approximately 50% of breast cancers are considered human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low. The DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as a treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer who have received prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, the Danish Breast Cancer Group guidelines recently included T-DXd as a treatment for HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. This economic evaluation aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd for the approved EMA indication in Denmark.
methodsA three-state-progression-free, post-progression, and death-partitioned survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd versus treatment of physician's choice over a lifetime horizon following the Danish Medicines Council guidelines. Clinical data were gathered from the DB-04 trial, and cost and resource use data were sourced from the literature. Sensitivity and scenario analysis were conducted to explore uncertainty.
resultsT-DXd led to 0.78 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and incurred DKK 621,325 in incremental costs compared to the treatment of physician's choice. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of DKK 795,181 per QALY gained, which falls below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity and scenario analyses showed the robustness of the deterministic result, with T-DXd remaining cost-effective.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that T-DXd is a cost-effective treatment for patients with HER2-low unresectable or metastatic breast cancer who have received prior chemotherapy in Denmark.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.