ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
EANM expert opinion: How can lessons from radiobiology be applied to the design of clinical trials? Part I: back to the basics of absorbed dose-response and threshold absorbed doses.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Oncology: Perspectives from Transatlantic Experts.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- From uniform to heterogeneous dose models: connecting cellular and tumor absorbed dose-response for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Radiation Biology of Radiopharmaceuticals: Beyond External Beam Radiation Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tumour Microenvironment-Informed Radiotheranostics: Why and How Nuclear Medicine Could Advance Precision Oncology in the Decade Ahead.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rational Radionuclide Therapy for Recurrent Meningioma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose-Effect Relationships in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Redifferentiation therapy in unresectable or metastatic radioactive iodine refractory thyroid cancer: an International Thyroid Oncology Group statement.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2025Review
- Optical (Cherenkov) dosimetry to unravel the radiobiological effects of radioisotope based therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study by the EANM radiobiology working group aims to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) using radiopharmaceuticals approved by the EMA and FDA for neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. It seeks to understand the correlation between physical parameters such as absorbed dose and TRT outcomes, alongside other biological factors.
methodsWe reviewed clinical studies on TRT, focusing on the relationship between physical parameters and treatment outcomes, and applying basic radiobiological principles to radiopharmaceutical therapy to identify key factors affecting therapeutic success.
resultsThe analysis revealed that mean absorbed dose alone is insufficient to predict treatment response or toxicity. For absorbed doses below a certain threshold, outcomes are unpredictable, while doses above this threshold improve the likelihood of biological responses. However, even at higher absorbed doses, response plateaus indicate the need for additional parameters to explain outcome variability, including heterogeneity in target expression, anatomical disease location, (epi)genetics, DNA repair capacity, and the tumor microenvironment, aspects that will be discussed in Part II of this analysis.
conclusionUnderstanding radiobiology is crucial for optimizing TRT. More dosimetric data is needed to refine treatment protocols. While absorbed dose is critical, it alone does not determine TRT outcomes. Future research should integrate biological parameters with physical dosimetry to enhance efficacy and minimize toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.