Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531084›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

EANM expert opinion: How can lessons from radiobiology be applied to the design of clinical trials? Part I: back to the basics of absorbed dose-response and threshold absorbed doses.

Jean-Pierre Pouget, Pablo Minguez Gabina, Ken Herrmann, Desirée Deandreis, Mark Konijnenberg, David Taieb, Fijs W B van Leeuwen, Jens Kurth, Uta Eberlein, Michael Lassmann and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Rational Radionuclide Therapy for Recurrent Meningioma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose-Effect Relationships in [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Optical (Cherenkov) dosimetry to unravel the radiobiological effects of radioisotope based therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jean-Pierre PougetInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France. Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer, INSERM U1194/IRCM, 208 Rue Des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France. jean-pierre.pouget@inserm.fr.
Pablo Minguez GabinaDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Gurutzeta-Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Desirée DeandreisNuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Paris Saclay University, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France.
Mark KonijnenbergRadiology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David TaiebNuclear Medicine Diagnostic Imaging and Endoradiotherapy Center Aix-Marseille University CHU de La Timone, Marseille Cedex 5, Marseille, France.
Fijs W B van LeeuwenInterventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jens KurthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Uta EberleinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael LassmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina LückerathDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Katharina.Lueckerath@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-2066
EANM Radiobiology Working Group

Funding

Prostate Cancer Foundation TACT01SIRIC Montpellier Cancer: Grant INCa-DGOS-INSERM- ITMO Cancer_ 18004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study by the EANM radiobiology working group aims to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) using radiopharmaceuticals approved by the EMA and FDA for neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. It seeks to understand the correlation between physical parameters such as absorbed dose and TRT outcomes, alongside other biological factors.

methodsWe reviewed clinical studies on TRT, focusing on the relationship between physical parameters and treatment outcomes, and applying basic radiobiological principles to radiopharmaceutical therapy to identify key factors affecting therapeutic success.

resultsThe analysis revealed that mean absorbed dose alone is insufficient to predict treatment response or toxicity. For absorbed doses below a certain threshold, outcomes are unpredictable, while doses above this threshold improve the likelihood of biological responses. However, even at higher absorbed doses, response plateaus indicate the need for additional parameters to explain outcome variability, including heterogeneity in target expression, anatomical disease location, (epi)genetics, DNA repair capacity, and the tumor microenvironment, aspects that will be discussed in Part II of this analysis.

conclusionUnderstanding radiobiology is crucial for optimizing TRT. More dosimetric data is needed to refine treatment protocols. While absorbed dose is critical, it alone does not determine TRT outcomes. Future research should integrate biological parameters with physical dosimetry to enhance efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicNuclear MedicineRadiobiologyResearch DesignDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsBiomarkersDosimetryRadiobiologyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceutical therapy

Identifiers

PMID39531084
PMCPMC11754366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.