ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Domains of four-step technique training program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in Resident Training: Is It Safe and Feasible?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic colectomy in patients with obesity with Colon cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany surgeons have begun learning about colorectal surgery using laparoscopy rather than laparotomy. The domains of four-step technique training program (DOF) for laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been designed and implemented by our institute since 2011, and they are expected to provide a safe and effective program for trainees with limited experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
methodThe DOF were established with standard surgical procedures, a four-step technique, and learning passports using point credits after the procedure was completed. Patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal resection at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2013 and April 2019 were enrolled.
resultsOverall, 2604 and 478 patients were enrolled in the non-training and training groups, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the postoperative short-term outcomes were not significantly associated with the training or non-training groups. However, the training group had a significantly longer operative time than the non-training group in the linear regression model. Once the trainee passed the proficiency point (passed 100 points or 30 cases), no significant difference in postoperative short-term outcomes was found between the patients in the non-training and training groups that underwent the entire surgery performed by the trainee.
conclusionWhen patients' safety was evaluated in the training cases under the DOF, no higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality were found compared to those in cases performed by experienced surgeons. Additionally, trainees who passed the proficiency point during DOF could safely perform the entire laparoscopic colorectal surgery under supervision without further adverse effects on the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39531080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.