Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531078›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2024

Added-value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to conventional MRI for the differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and squamous cell carcinoma in the sinonasal region.

Qi Wang, Xinyan Wang, Hangzhi Liu, Zhen Wang, Junfang Xian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumour of Head and Neck: A Systematic Review Plus Meta-Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qi Wang *Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 of Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xinyan Wang *Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 of Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Hangzhi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 of Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Junfang XianDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 of Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. cjr.xianjunfang@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-9393

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan DFL20190203Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Anhui Province 2022YFC2404005National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) in differentiation between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the sinonasal cavity.

methodsPatients with pathologically proven IMT and SCC in the sinonasal region were enrolled in this retrospective study. All participants underwent conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, while a subset of them performed DWI. All the MRI parameters were independently analyzed by two investigators.

resultsThis retrospective study included 21 patients with IMT and 55 patients with SCC. Significant differences were found in the conventional MR imaging features including mass margin, T2 signal intensity and track sign of maxillary (p < 0.05). For DCE-MRI features, significant differences were found in progressive centripetal continual enhancement and CImax (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively). A marginal significant difference was found in ADC values between IMT (0.86 ± 0.59) and SCC (1.14 ± 0.25) (p = 0.061). The conventional MRI analysis revealed that the combination of mass margin and track sign of maxillary yielded an accuracy of 81.6%. Using a combination of progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI and track sign of maxillary in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the accuracy was elevated to 92.1%.

conclusionThe incorporation of DCE-MRI features into conventional MRI showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating IMT from SCC in the sinonasal region. The novel progressive centripetal continual enhancement on DCE-MRI is the most effective feature of IMT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellContrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDynamic contrast-enhanced MRIInflammatory myofibroblastic tumorNasal cavityParanasal sinusSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.