Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39531072›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Biofertilizer use in the United States: definition, regulation, and prospects.

Flavia Santos, Suraj Melkani, Christiane Oliveira-Paiva, Daniel Bini, Kiran Pavuluri, Luke Gatiboni, Anik Mahmud, Maria Torres, Eric McLamore, Jehangir H Bhadha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Flavia SantosSoil, Water & Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL, USA.
Suraj MelkaniSoil, Water & Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL, USA.
Christiane Oliveira-PaivaEmbrapa Maize and Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Daniel BiniEmbrapa Maize and Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Kiran PavuluriInternational Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, AL, USA.
Luke GatiboniNorth Carolina State Extension, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Anik MahmudSoil, Water & Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL, USA.
Maria TorresPlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Eric McLamoreAgricultural Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Jehangir H BhadhaSoil, Water & Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL, USA. jango@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9436-1725

Funding

Foreign Agricultural Service Fertilize4LifeNational Science Foundation ScienceNational Science Foundation Technology Center (CBET-2019435)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable food production has driven a surge in the use and commercialization of biological inputs, including biofertilizers. In this context, biofertilizers offer potential benefits for nutrient use efficiency, crop yield and sustainability. However, inconsistent definition of the term "biofertilizer" and regulations, particularly in the USA, hinder market growth and consumer confidence. While the European Union, and countries like Brazil, India, and China have made progress in this area, the USA market, projected to exceed $1 billion by 2029, lacks clear guidelines for biofertilizer production and sale. The USA market is dominated by Rhizobium genus, Mycorrhizae fungi, and Azospirillum species and based products targeting various crops. Although there is a growing and promising market for the use of biofertilizers, there are still many challenges to overcome, and to fully realize the potential of biofertilizers, future research should focus on modes of action, specific claims, and robust regulations that must be established. KEY POINTS: • The term "biofertilizer" lacks a universally accepted definition • It is necessary establishing a national regulation for biofertilizers in the USA • The biofertilizer market is growing fast and the biggest one is in America.

Indexed as

FertilizersCrops, AgriculturalMycorrhizaeRhizobiumUnited StatesFertilizersBiologicalBiostimulantInoculantMicroorganismsSoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID39531072
PMCPMC11557716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.