ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Thoracotomy patch repair of large diaphragmatic herniae in a porcine model: a tale of two patches.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCongenital diaphragmatic herniae (CDH) may require patch closure in 50% of the cases. We assessed a biologic and composite mesh in a porcine CDH model.
methodsLeft sided thoracotomy was performed in 20 pigs. Approximately, 30% of the diaphragm was excised and the patch (Surgisis® or Parietex®) inserted to close this defect. The pigs were killed at 6 months and the diaphragm was harvested for biomechanical and histological assessment.
resultsThe mean weight of the pigs at surgery and killing were 6.1 kg (4.2-8.4 kg) and 94.1 kg (80-131 kg), respectively. There were two recurrences and three eventrations, all with Surgisis®. There were less dense lung and abdominal adhesions in the Parietex group (P < 0.0001 and 0.025, respectively). The tensile strength of the Surgisis®, the Parietex® groups and controls were similar. There was significantly more muscle in-growth in the Parietex® patch over Surgisis® (p = 0.016).
conclusionParietex® and Surgisis® patches at 6 months have a similar tensile strength to normal tissue. All recurrences and eventrations were in the Surgisis® group. Parietex® patches demonstrated more muscle in-growth into the patch compared to Surgisis®. This is the first study utilising Parietex® composite patch in the repair of large diaphragmatic defects in a porcine model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39531056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.