ReviewRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Broken spinal needle: Clinical case and a brief review of the literature].
Review in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia can present various complications, one of which is the breakage of a spinal needle within the intrathecal space, which is one of the least frequent complications and it may be serious. A case of spinal needle breakage is presented, pointing out its risk factors and recommendations to reduce it. Clinical case: 5-year-old female patient, who was scheduled for removal of translocated intrauterine device causing chronic pain. When attempting a spinal anesthesia, stylet was removed from the needle and directed into the subarachnoid space. Upon extraction, the spinal needle was deformed and shortened. Immediately and with fluoroscopy and local anesthesia, the broken fragment was extracted without complications. Regional anesthesia is widely used in pregnant women, as it is considered safe. However, there are factors that increase the probability of a spinal needle breakage (obesity, pregnancy, emergency procedures, incorrect handling of the spinal needle, etc.). Even so, there are various recommendations (use of ultrasound, proper handling of the needle, reducing the number of attempts, etc.) that can reduce the risk of spinal needle breakage. Conclusion: Risk factors for spinal needle breakage should be identified, in order to decrease its incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.