ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2024
[Economic analysis of the use of the Flt-1/PlGF preeclampsia ratio compared to the standard of care in Uruguay].
Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test in pregnant patients with suspected pre-eclampsia: a systematic review.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Correlation Between Immune-Inflammatory Biomarkers During Pregnancy and Postpartum and Adverse Outcomes of Preeclampsia: A Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancyrelated hypertensive disorder that can lead to severe complications and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the economic impact of integrating the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio into Uruguay's healthcare system as part of routine clinical practice for diagnosing. Material and methods: A decision tree model was used to estimate the annual economic impact on the Uruguayan healthcare system for a hypothetical cohort of women with suspected PE. This included relevant costs associated with diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment from the initial presentation of suspected PE until childbirth. The study analyzed the annual costs under two scenarios: the standard of care and a scenario incorporating the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for PE, using 2022 as the reference year. Various deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The economic model estimated that the implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio could save the Uruguayan healthcare system $95,432,678 Uruguayan pesos (2,320,269 United States Dollars [USD]) annually, representing a 5 % reduction in costs compared with the standard of care. These savings were primarily due to a reduction in hospitalizations of women with suspected PE. The estimated economic impact equated to an annual net saving of approximately $10,602 Uruguayan pesos (258 USD) per patient. Conclusions: The introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio into the Uruguayan healthcare system is likely to generate savings due to the optimization of the management of hospitalizations for women with suspected preeclampsia (PE). However, the potential for savings will primarily depend on the current hospitalization rate of these women (the efficiency of managing high-risk PE pregnancies) and the length of stay for hospitalized women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.