Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530703›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Antimicrobial Peptides: A Promising Alternative to Conventional Antimicrobials for Combating Polymicrobial Biofilms.

Cesar Augusto Roque-Borda, Laura Maria Duran Gleriani Primo, Kaila Petronila Medina-Alarcón, Isabella C Campos, Camila de Fátima Nascimento, Mauro M S Saraiva, Angelo Berchieri Junior, Ana Marisa Fusco-Almeida, Maria José Soares Mendes-Giannini, João Perdigão and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cesar Augusto Roque-BordaDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-0383
Laura Maria Duran Gleriani PrimoDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2752-9302
Kaila Petronila Medina-AlarcónDepartment of Clinical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-7780
Isabella C CamposSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-6085
Camila de Fátima NascimentoSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8639-4076
Mauro M S SaraivaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1875-4495
Angelo Berchieri JuniorSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2522-6500
Ana Marisa Fusco-AlmeidaDepartment of Clinical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-8988
Maria José Soares Mendes-GianniniDepartment of Clinical Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8059-0826
João PerdigãoiMed.ULisboa-Institute for Medicines Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1649004, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-1305
Fernando Rogério PavanDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-3963
Fernando AlbericioPeptide Science Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-0462

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil Code-001FAPESP - São Paulo Research Foundation 2020/16573-3FAPESP - São Paulo Research Foundation 2021/14603-5FAPESP - São Paulo Research Foundation 2023/01664-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymicrobial biofilms adhere to surfaces and enhance pathogen resistance to conventional treatments, significantly contributing to chronic infections in the respiratory tract, oral cavity, chronic wounds, and on medical devices. This review examines antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as a promising alternative to traditional antibiotics for treating biofilm-associated infections. AMPs, which can be produced as part of the innate immune response or synthesized therapeutically, have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, often disrupting microbial cell membranes and causing cell death. Many specifically target negatively charged bacterial membranes, unlike host cell membranes. Research shows AMPs effectively inhibit and disrupt polymicrobial biofilms and can enhance conventional antibiotics' efficacy. Preclinical and clinical research is advancing, with animal studies and clinical trials showing promise against multidrug-resistant bacteria and fungi. Numerous patents indicate increasing interest in AMPs. However, challenges such as peptide stability, potential cytotoxicity, and high production costs must be addressed. Ongoing research focuses on optimizing AMP structures, enhancing stability, and developing cost-effective production methods. In summary, AMPs offer a novel approach to combating biofilm-associated infections, with their unique mechanisms and synergistic potential with existing antibiotics positioning them as promising candidates for future treatments.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial PeptidesBiofilmsAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsHumansAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Peptidesantimicrobial alternativesbiofilmsdrug discoverypolymicrobial interactions

Identifiers

PMID39530703
PMCPMC11714181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.