ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2024
Knowledge and Attitude on Neonatal Resuscitation Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study assesses nursing students' knowledge and attitudes toward neonatal resuscitation. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a nursing college in June 2024. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data on knowledge and attitudes toward neonatal resuscitation were collected using self-administered web-based questionnaires. Statistical analyses were used to examine the comparisons, correlations, and predictors, including t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation tests, and binomial logistic regression. Results: Statistical analyses showed that 45.2% of nursing students had moderate knowledge, 39% had good knowledge, and all exhibited positive attitudes. BSc nursing students, those with prior neonatal resuscitation training, and those who had witnessed or performed resuscitation had significantly higher knowledge (p ≤.001). III-year Diploma students, those aged 22-23, and students with 6-10 days of NICU/labor room posting also had higher knowledge (p ≤ .001, p ≤ .005). Additionally, BSc students and those with prior training displayed significantly more positive attitudes (p ≤ .001). A moderate positive correlation was found between knowledge and attitude, with key predictors being labor room posting duration for knowledge and exam marks for attitude. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for improved neonatal resuscitation education and training of nursing students to improve outcomes and reduce mortality rates among newborns. To ensure effective newborn care, educational programs can be designed to target specific areas such as clinical exposure and resuscitation training. Comprehensive training initiatives aligned with international guidelines are vital for developing proficient neonatal resuscitation practices. Such proactive approaches can help build a cohort of competent healthcare professionals who can deliver timely and effective interventions, thereby ensuring the well-being of newborns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.